Cull
Remove duplicates and obviously irrelevant material without pretending the discarded set was deeply reasoned over.
Deep Discovery is a sales-led, scoped Nexus and Enterprise workflow designed to organize a large private corpus, retrieve decision-relevant evidence, reason across the selected material, and subject findings to adversarial review before a human relies on them. Capacity, coverage, extraction quality and deliverables require a validated signed scope.
A data room may contain thousands of individually plausible documents and only a handful of facts that reverse the economics, expose a control failure or invalidate a thesis. Keyword search finds mentions. Due diligence must explain why a fact matters, connect it to the decision and show the path back to source evidence.
Remove duplicates and obviously irrelevant material without pretending the discarded set was deeply reasoned over.
Find evidence against explicit diligence questions, criteria and risk hypotheses—not a generic summary request.
Assign distinct analytic seats to attack findings, search for counterevidence and preserve unresolved disagreements. Cross-provider composition does not establish statistical independence.
| Layer | 3Dogs public position | Required control |
|---|---|---|
| Collection and preservation | Not claimed as a public 3Dogs capability | Use approved collection, legal-hold and chain-of-custody systems |
| Processing, OCR and deduplication | May be part of a validated Enterprise scope; no universal coverage claim | Record source set, transformations, exclusions, errors and versioned manifest |
| Search and retrieval | Designed to retrieve evidence against explicit questions and hypotheses | Preserve queries, citations, missing evidence and retrieval limits |
| Judgment layer | Designed to connect retrieved facts to a business decision and challenge findings | Keep the run record, alternatives, dissent and what would change the conclusion |
| Privilege determination | Not claimed | Qualified counsel controls privilege review and waiver decisions |
| Legal opinion | Not claimed; Deep Discovery is decision support | Qualified counsel remains responsible |
| Source traceability | Required for a finding to be reviewable | Retain document and passage references plus transformation provenance |
| Human review | Required before reliance | Named qualified reviewer accepts, rejects or remands findings |
No public page claims corpus completeness, recall, cost savings, privilege accuracy or legal-grade output. The due-diligence citation analysis reports recorded sources for these queries; it does not validate the underlying answers.
The published Reynolds record reports that eight planted risks were found. The corpus, answer key, manifest and scoring script are not public, so an independent rerun is not currently possible. This is not a production customer outcome.
Review the case and limitations →3Dogs reports 45,320 deduplicated messages processed and 981 documents fully read. Transformation, coverage and blind-review protocol are not independently reproducible. The record does not establish predictive certainty or the same result on another corpus.
Review the case and limitations →Document-room work is negotiated because corpus size, source systems, decision questions, security review, retention, model routing and deployment constraints materially change the engagement.
Review the current Trust Center, Privacy Policy, Security page and signed terms before sending private data.
Deep Discovery does not replace counsel, auditors, accountants, investigators, investment committees or statutory decision-makers. Model output can omit, misread or overstate evidence. Findings must retain citations and be reviewed by qualified humans in the context of the transaction.